1.Should images in your case study be censored - if so why?
There has been clouds of controversy over this program and whether some things in it should be censored. One camera recording in the series that has received, probably, the most controversy of all was a shot where girls as young as 6 were dressed in skimpy clothes dancing like R&B dancers. The main reason for the controversy was the fact that the shot was inappropriate as young girls shouldn't be put on TV in this way. However other Gypsy communities have hit out saying its a misrepresentation of their culture and will create friction. I agree with both sides to the argument and feel that it shouldn't be shown on TV... in that way. The program is a documentary and should show what it sees it should also make obvious to the viewer that the actions on screen are specific to that certain culture and not create a generalisation of all Gypsy cultures.
2.If you think your case study can have a negative effect on collective groups. Could it have a positive effect?
I believe the program can and already has had a negative effect on Gypsies all around the UK. There have been reports if Gypsy children being teased and mocked at school by other pupils, about the program. This is unfair and only the program and the way it has been made is to blame. However there could be a good side to this program. The awareness of Gypsy/traveler culture has been raised. Issues surrounding the eviction of Gypsies, which can be very traumatic, have been documented and discussed on the program. This has lead to a better understanding and empathy toward the culture.
3.Do you agree that your case study could influence someones behavior?
Yes I do agree with this statement. People may act differently toward Gypsy communities and have already acted differently. Cases of business and contracts involving Gypsies have fallen through and been canceled and the program has been blamed as it has scared off customers.
No comments:
Post a Comment